Westminster Couple's Healthful Choices in Sharp Contrast to Denver Leaders
Face the State Staff Report
Westminster – Ari Armstrong is fed up with politicians and pundits pouting about how poor folks can't possibly survive on government handouts.
After a much publicized effort by Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper earlier this summer designed to show the difficulties of living on food stamps, Armstrong is out to prove not only that families can survive on a tight food budget--but that they can also eat well.
In June, Hickenlooper and Roxane White, manager for Denver Human Services, spent a week living on a food stamp budget. The city officials, with the aid of frequent and prominent media reports, took up the quest to highlight the government's food stamp program that benefits 250,000 Coloradans. After his week-long challenge, Hickenlooper pledged his support for a Congressional effort to expand food stamp allocations.
"Two days into the challenge, I began to realize how difficult - almost impossible - such a budget is, even just for a week," Hickenlooper told a reporter in a June 11 Rocky Mountain News report.
Armstrong and his wife Jennifer say Hickenlooper's call for expanded food stamp funding is the wrong approach. To prove it, they are putting their stomachs where their mouths are, vowing to live on a food stamp-like diet for the entire month of August. They will each spend about $3 a day, a figure below current food stamp allocation of about $3.50 a day per person, to prove their point.
"Being poor in the United States today is not the same as being poor in Africa," Ari Armstrong said. "It is nice to live in a country where obesity, not starvation, is a problem among the poor."
The Armstrongs say they know a thing or two about living in poverty. Jennifer's family relied on food stamps when she was a child and according to Ari, his mother fed a family of six on $100 a month. Inflation, he concedes, has changed the equation, but the couple maintains that families can still get by on a few dollars a day per person.
"We thought it would be fun and interesting to prove that people can live on $3 per day for food," Jennifer Armstrong said. "After my parents were separated, my family had to go on food stamps; we needed some help for about six months. My mom was pretty embarrassed. She didn't shop at the same stores, but then she found a really nice job and got herself off the program. It was a limited thing."
In contrast to Hickenlooper's position, Ari Armstrong argues that increased funding for expanded food stamp programs won't lift anyone out of poverty or help families eat better. "My wife and I are solid middle class," he said. "High taxes are our main barrier. Higher taxes make people less independent and less able to give to charities."
Ari Armstrong says he looks to the private sector or charitable organizations, and not the government, to address the needs of the poor. A well-known libertarian activist and writer, he contends that non-governmental entities, such as food banks, do a better job delivery food to needy families.
Government handouts tend to make people dependent, Ari Armstrong contends.
"Many people use food stamps responsibly and as a step toward independence," he said. " But there is a greater tendency to foster dependency on the government rather than help people transition to independence."
While some might brand Ari Armstrong a poverty bully, he says he feels for the less fortunate. "I recognize that, at some point in their lives, some people fall on hard times because of a job loss, unexpected divorce, or other emergency," he said. "It's certainly appropriate in those circumstances to accept a little help while struggling to land back on two feet."
DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE SAME BUDGET
Hickenlooper, in a June 11th Rocky Mountain News report, offered the following response to his week on a food stamp budget:
"I was hungry when I woke up and when I went to bed. It affected my physical energy and my mental energy. Food and the cost of food took up much of my time. I took no morsel for granted. I learned quickly that it's very difficult to eat nutritiously on $3.57 a day. I'd never considered fresh fruit, vegetables and coffee luxuries, but they are. I realized, too, that with time to cook, I could eat more cheaply. For example, an egg on a tortilla costs far less but requires much more time to prepare than a quick bowl of whole- grain cereal with milk and fruit."
According to Ari Armstrong, Hickenlooper and White could have eaten better had they planned ahead. For example, White spent a lot of her money on instant soup. Armstrong, meanwhile, picked up bulk items and made a massive home-made of soup to carry him through the month. He also purchased a lot of eggs, rice, beans and bananas.
"Target brand of brown rice costs 89 cents per pound. A pound cooks with four cups of water, which weighs around two pounds, so cooked rice costs around 30 cents per pound -- a pretty good deal," Ari Armstrong pointed out, adding his own recipe suggestions. "Rice is great in soup, in burritos, and with cinnamon. Pinto beans cost 62 cents per pound. Black beans, lentils, and split peas cost 72 or 76 cents per pound. A pound of beans cooks with six cups (3 pounds) of water, so that's less than 20 cents per pound for cooked beans. And that's why beans are a poor family's friend. "
To prepare for their challenge this month, the Armstongs used much of their meager monthly food stamp stipend to stock up on bulk items. They have filled their refrigerator and freezer with eggs, milk, pasta, beans, oats and rice. They plan to splurge on chicken and some hamburger for meatloaf and still have money left over by month's end.
Ari Armstrong said White made poor use of her weekly food funds. "She spent $5.46 on instant soups and $7.45 on frozen meals," he said. "That is not the best nutritional value for the dollar when you are on a tight budget. My wife and I know that it is possible to eat on a tight budget."
ARMSTRONGS CHALLENGE OTHERS TO LIVE WELL ON LESS
Ari Armstrong challenged Denver Post columnist Diane Carmen, active in promoting Hickenlooper's June effort, and the newspaper's editorial board to contribute to a charity of his choosing should the Armstrongs end up with extra food money come Aug 31. Ari Armstrong says Carmen and the paper's editorial leaders rejected the challenge.
"This just goes to show that these writers for The Denver Post lack the courage of their convictions," Armstrong wrote on his Web site.
Carmen and Hickenlooper did not respond to a request for comment by Face the State.
To learn more about the Armstrongs' food stamp challenge, visit the Colorado Freedom Report, run by Ari Armstrong, here.

He talks the walk, while others walk the walk
On August 17th, 2007 sheblogger says:
Clearly, Hick can "suffer" on a food stamp diet for a week if it means good PR, but he doesn't have a clue about the realities that most working families endure. That's the point.
Riddle me this....
On August 16th, 2007 Steve Balboni says:
if "handouts" from the Government make people become dependent then why don't "handouts" from church groups and the like cause this same dependency?
Just two ingredients missing here
On August 14th, 2007 ZenCueist says:
I've lived on $120/month worth of food stamps since April, and I agree with the Armstrongs. I've actually gained a few pounds during this time!
The grandstanders who try the $3.50/'day diet don't know how to shop or the first thing about nutrition. Every one of us would be healthier on a Zen diet of rice, nuts, and fresh fruits and veggies. But don't tell the affluent, or they'll drive the price of healthy food up beyond the maximum food stamp allowance. Heck, broccoli is going for four bucks a pound already!
However, it's difficult to buy in bulk when you're homeless and have no place to store a month's worth of food. I'm in a zero-star motel, courtesy of the Coalition for the Homeless. But its mini-fridge won't hold two ice trays, let alone a cauldron of soup. Cooking facilities are also a problem, especially when cops roust people roasting barley over an open fire.
What the homeless need are communal refrigeration and cooking facilities. Busy yuppies can buy pre-measured gourmet ingredients and rent a "Kitchen Stadium" professional facility. It would be grand if such businesses could spare a few cubic feet and hours of stove time for those who truly need them, perhaps in exchange for dishwashing and food preparation.
so...
On August 16th, 2007 Steve Balboni says:
you are living in a zero star hotel and posting on a blog? Did they provide you with a laptop and wi-fi at this zero star hotel?
Finally, someone calls out Hickenlooper!
On August 14th, 2007 sheblogger says:
Thank you Face the State!
I'm so sick of the Hickenlooper glory train. Thank you for identifying him as the elitist he is. One week he's in Esquire wearing thousand dollar suits and the next he's calling on Congress to expand food stamp programs.
Real people learn to live on real budgets Mr. Mayor! Stop expecting the middle class to fund your guilt through yet more tax increases!
clarify
On August 16th, 2007 Steve Balboni says:
what does the fact that he is wearing expensive suits have to do with his call for humane social programs? That doesn't make him elitist. The wealthy have fought for the less fortunate for centuries, this actually makes them the opposite of elitist