| Request new password
COLORADO'S FRONTPAGE

Face the State

Cadman: Where is the Ref. C Money Our Schools Were Promised?


September 17, 2007

By State Representative Bill Cadman
Special to Face the State

State Rep. Jerry Frangas, D-Denver, is doing what most people would do in his position - he is trying to get a bigger piece of the pie for his constituents. In the face of a statewide tax increase, he's lobbying to get more money for Denver schools. While it's hard to blame him, this effort is ultimately a distraction from the larger question we face: Why are our taxes being raised yet again to fund schools when just last year taxpayers agreed to a fork over billions of dollars in the name of better educated children?

In 2006, voters approved Referendum C, a tax increase that has thus far raised government revenue by nearly $6 billion. They authorized this massive public investment based on promises of smaller classes and higher teacher salaries. They were told there would be more money for students with special needs. They felt they could trust Democrats who stood atop the steps of the state capitol, looked into television cameras, and told them that our children would be the beneficiaries.

Today, Democrats are talking out of both sides of their mouths. They're using accounting gimmicks to try to say their promises have resulted in greater funding. Sure, the Referendum C money--called "general fund exempt", showed a $261 million line item in the 2006-2007 K-12 budget. What it doesn't show, however, is that "general fund" dollars for K-12 were simultaneously reduced by $306 million. In sum, in the aftermath of Colorado's largest tax increase, our schools are actually being forced to make do on $45 million less in state taxpayer dollars.

And not even a year later, as our schools wait to collect on promises made, Democrats are already taking more of our hard-earned money. During the 2007 legislative session, under the direction of Gov. Bill Ritter, Democrats passed another tax increase they say will help education. It will take $49 million that would have otherwise been returned to voters through lower property taxes and instead diverts this money into the state's education fund.

Frangas is challenging Ritter, saying that if his plan is to proceed, Denver schools deserve a nearly $9 million break because Denver taxpayers kick more money into the state's education fund than those in any other county. Notably, Frangas was one of the few Democrats who voted against Ritter's tax increase. If we are going to have it, however, he argues the money should go to Denver schools because--as he puts it--they invest the most in schools and have the greatest need.

But do they? To imply that Denver schools are experiencing greater needs for textbooks and teachers than other areas of the state is less than accurate. If the city's schools are not getting enough resources to do the job, they are not alone.

Teachers in my hometown of Colorado Springs are suffering as a result of being mislead about the amount of funding that would come to them via Ref C. Just last week, I talked with one veteran teacher who is so frustrated with the situation, she says she's on the verge of resigning. And with good cause.

Her school year in Colorado Springs District 11 began with 23 fifth graders. But within three weeks, her class size had jumped by 25 percent, up to 28 students. The increase, she was told, was the result of a money-saving effort by the district. Because the kindergarten classes had grown so large, the district was forced to to hire two new aides. According to the teacher, the principal eliminated a class serving fourth and fifth graders, opting to transfer that teacher to kindergarten duties. Her previous students were then moved to other classes, which were already full.

The teacher expressed grave frustrations to me about the situation, noting that the special-needs students transferred to her classroom will fail to get the attention they need--and deserve--in a classroom of nearly 30 students. As a result, she fears, they will likely fall behind and get lost in the system.

So Rep. Frangas, this is just one story of one teacher in one classroom, but I am sure there is a story for every school in each of our districts that cries out for attention and resources.

The teachers in my district, like those in Rep. Frangas's, deserve better. While I can understand Rep. Frangas's attempt to get more money for his district, his effort is a distraction from the larger problem we face. Voters were lied to in 2006, when they approved Referendum C, a nearly $6 billion tax increase.

When I asked a budget committee staff member about how a $6 billion tax increase, passed based on promises of better schools, could result in a $45 million decrease in education funding, he responded that it was an “accounting measure.” Hmmm, I took accounting in college, but this seems a lot more like something that the Enron accountants tried and we all know how that turned out. I hope our schools, staffed by great teachers, do not suffer the same fate.

Rep. Bill Cadman, R-Colo. Springs, serves as the Minority Caucus Chairman for the Colorado House of Representatives


Miscommunication (Accident or Intentional?)

Mr. Cadman really paints an interesting picture. Doesn't he? Yes, it is true that the Republicans and the Dems have created this expansive (over blown) government we live in. Mr. Cadman isn't aware that the policy that is in place was suggested by a group of conservatives who served on the DAAC in 1995. Their criticism was that there were teachers who resided in a protected status. Too few kids to justify their salaries.

As such, D-11 created a program of "Zero Based" staffing. Teachers are no longer guaranteed tenure at a particular school. If the student count doesn't justify the position, the position is eliminated and teaching assistants hired, or the instructor is transferred. Makes perfectly good sense. Happens in business every day...its known as "Right Sizing."

Wonder what Mr. Cadman's comments would have been if he knew this fact. Besides, the size and scope of government in colorado has continued to grow over the years. No matter who is in charge.

I do wonder, however, who wrote the article for Mr. Cadman? That is who we should be talking to.

So Ken, you're saying after

So Ken, you're saying after the people voted for a tax increase for certain things, we need to have another vote ordering the legislature to spend it on those things? Still sounds like we elected the wrong people to the legislature.
Jane

Lies and tax increases

Jane--while I agree with you about tax increases upon tax increases lets don't forget that gobv. Bill Owens and other republicans were all for this. Although the budget make up and aproval were not Gov Owens' one would have to know that he is at least as smart as we are and knew this was coming. I just broaden your view to include the majoritory of politations maybe even most people.Jane--while I agree with you about tax increases upon tax increases lets don't forget that gov. Bill Owens and other republicans were all for this. Although the budget make up and approval were not Gov Owens' one would have to know that he is at least as smart as we are and knew this was coming. I just broaden your view to include most politicians maybe even most people. This voter approved increase was sold to the voters as a solution to our State's money problems but how many times have we been told one thing and have another happen? "Fool me once, sham on you; fool me twice, sham on me." That being said, I'm glad that I'm hearing about this shell game more and more because if more people know about it maybe the next budget will be in line with what people thought they were voting for. No that won't happen, once the government has your money they just want more. I guess we need another amendment stating that the ref C money has to be used for the purposes stated and that there can not be a decrease in the money that was already going to the programs--in other words a true increase in spending. Better yet, lets repeal ref C and keep the money for ourselves.

Lies and tax increases

This is what the voters asked for when they voted for Democrats - lies, shell games and tax increase upon tax increase.
Jane